This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] sim/ChangeLog: Correct the related items' position and format.
- From: Chen Gang S <gang dot chen at sunrus dot com dot cn>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:19:48 +0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim/ChangeLog: Correct the related items' position and format.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <54E53730 dot 4060102 at sunrus dot com dot cn> <20150219022223 dot GD544 at vapier> <54E5C29D dot 2090902 at redhat dot com> <54E5CD87 dot 3070603 at sunrus dot com dot cn> <54E5CD7B dot 2080306 at redhat dot com>
On 2/19/15 19:48, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 11:48 AM, Chen Gang S wrote:
>> On 2/19/15 19:01, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> On 02/19/2015 02:22 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>> On 19 Feb 2015 09:06, Chen Gang S wrote:
>>>>> --- a/sim/ChangeLog
>>>>> +++ b/sim/ChangeLog
>>>>>
>>>>> + * ChangeLog: Move sub-modules related items to their own
>>>>> + ChangeLogs.
>>>>
>>>> heh, so meta. i'm not sure we generally do this ... does anyone else have input
>>>> here ?
>>>
>>> Yeah. ChangeLog changes don't get mentioned in ChangeLog.
>>>
>>
>> OK, thanks, I guess your meaning is "If we only change the ChangeLog
>> contents, we don't need additional ChangeLog comment for it.". e.g. in
>> our case, we don't need the contents below (they need to be removed when
>> I send patch v2):
>
> Right. To be super clear, drop the "only":
>
> "If we change the ChangeLog contents, we don't need additional ChangeLog comment for it."
>
OK, thanks. What you said sounds a little more preciser.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed