This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 18 Feb 2015 15:40, Jiri Gaisler wrote: > On 02/17/2015 09:59 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 17 Feb 2015 08:44, Jiri Gaisler wrote: > >> +extern struct pstate sregs; > >> + > >> +void > >> +boot_init () > > > > also looks like this is missing an update to a header to add the prototype ? > > This is done in patch (17/23). ok, but patches things really should be standalone. although your series is pretty good already in terms of splitting things apart. > >> +{ > >> + mec_write(MEC_WCR, 0); /* zero waitstates */ > >> + mec_write(MEC_TRAPD, 0); /* turn off watch-dog */ > >> + mec_write(MEC_RTC_SCALER, sregs.freq-1); /* generate 1 MHz RTC tick */ > >> + mec_write(MEC_MEMCFG, (3 << 18) | (4 << 10)); /* 1 MB ROM, 4 MB RAM */ > >> + sregs.wim = 2; > >> + sregs.psr = 0x110010e0; > >> + sregs.r[30] = RAM_END; > >> + sregs.r[14] = sregs.r[30] - 96*4; > >> + mec_mcr |= 1; /* power-down enabled */ > >> +} > > > > why isn't sregs passed in as an arg ? looks like both callers have a pointer to > > it already. > > I am saving this for next major update - SMP support. All globals will then > be removed and the full cpu state will be in a struct that is passed to the > simulation engine. In this way I can simulate multiple cpu's. can't this particular bit be done already ? or is the global pointer diff from the local one ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |