This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 03/36] C++ keyword cleanliness, mostly auto-generated
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:59:20 +0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/36] C++ keyword cleanliness, mostly auto-generated
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1423524046-20605-1-git-send-email-palves at redhat dot com> <1423524046-20605-4-git-send-email-palves at redhat dot com> <20150211075749 dot GJ4738 at adacore dot com> <54DB2E8D dot 9000103 at redhat dot com> <54DB3416 dot 1010404 at redhat dot com> <20150212121910 dot GL4738 at adacore dot com> <54DCA74C dot 3000208 at redhat dot com> <54DCBBFB dot 4020506 at redhat dot com>
> >> > I haven't had a chance to review all the patches, and I will admit
> >> > that I winced a little when seeing some of them (but accepted them),
> > Not sure whether I want to ask which. :-)
>
> Probably a minor thing, but I'd like to avoid a potential misunderstanding
> here. I just realized that I never really knew what "winced" really means,
> and that I may have misinterpreted what you said, which I guess
> can make my response sound odd. What I understood was that some of
> the patches were ugly, but you accepted them anyway in the name
> of progress. :-)
No worries, the answer made total sense to me, and is exactly what
I expected it to be, with the humour that matched the evasiveness
of the statement ;-).
I didn't say which one(s) it was, because I don't want to be the one
starting a debate on them. In the end, I accepted them because I just
did not see a better solution anyway.
--
Joel