This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCHSET] [4/4] Fix various issue in TUI
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 12:07:26 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] [4/4] Fix various issue in TUI
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <83vbkrbt4d dot fsf at gnu dot org> <54AAEC02 dot 7020500 at redhat dot com> <83bnmd8028 dot fsf at gnu dot org> <83y4p1zq7k dot fsf at gnu dot org>
On 01/17/2015 09:55 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> > Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 22:06:07 +0200
>> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> >
>>> > > Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 19:54:42 +0000
>>> > > From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
>>> > >
>>> > > On 12/31/2014 05:56 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>> > > > Well, one patch is Windows-specific after all. This patch makes sure
>>>> > > > windows-termcap is not compiled when GDB is linked against ncurses,
>>> > >
>>> > > ...
>>> > >
>>>> > > > and also makes the file a no-op should it compile in that
>>>> > > > configuration.
>>> > >
>>> > > With the configure.ac change, how can that happen?
>> >
>> > It shouldn't.
I'd have preferred to drop that hunk then. It just seems to
be either pointless or hiding some problem with the
configure.ac check.
> Don't use windows-termcap.c when linking against a curses library
>
> gdb/
> 2015-01-17 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
> * configure.ac [*mingw32*]: Only add windows-termcap.o to
> CONFIG_OBS if not building with a curses library.
>
> * windows-termcap.c: Include defs.h. Make the whole body empty if
> either one of HAVE_CURSES_H or HAVE_NCURSES_H or
> HAVE_NCURSES_NCURSES_H is defined.
>
> diff --git a/gdb/configure.ac b/gdb/configure.ac
> index 8dd7f8f..b852b93 100644
> --- a/gdb/configure.ac
> +++ b/gdb/configure.ac
> @@ -611,9 +611,10 @@ case $host_os in
> ac_cv_search_tgetent="none required"
> ;;
> *mingw32*)
> - ac_cv_search_tgetent="none required"
> - CONFIG_OBS="$CONFIG_OBS windows-termcap.o"
> - ;;
> + if test x"$prefer_curses" != xyes; then
> + ac_cv_search_tgetent="none required"
> + CONFIG_OBS="$CONFIG_OBS windows-termcap.o"
> + fi ;;
I'm still confused and not convinced this is the right
predicate. You said:
"This patch makes sure windows-termcap is not compiled
when GDB is linked against ncurses".
But that doesn't look to be what the patch does.
I asked about $curses_found before because AFAICS, it's quite
possible for $prefer_curses to be set, but $curses_found
to be "no". By default, we try configuring the TUI:
# Enable TUI.
AC_ARG_ENABLE(tui,
AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-tui], [enable full-screen terminal user interface (TUI)]),
[case $enableval in
yes | no | auto)
;;
*)
AC_MSG_ERROR([bad value $enableval for --enable-tui]) ;;
esac],enable_tui=auto)
And that always results in $prefer_curses set to yes:
# For the TUI, we need enhanced curses functionality.
if test x"$enable_tui" != xno; then
prefer_curses=yes
fi
But then we check if curses is really found:
curses_found=no
if test x"$prefer_curses" = xyes; then
...
AC_SEARCH_LIBS(waddstr, [ncurses cursesX curses])
if test "$ac_cv_search_waddstr" != no; then
curses_found=yes
fi
fi
And then it's $curses_found that we check:
# Check whether we should enable the TUI, but only do so if we really
# can.
if test x"$enable_tui" != xno; then
if test -d $srcdir/tui; then
if test "$curses_found" != no; then
...
else
if test x"$enable_tui" = xyes; then
AC_MSG_ERROR([no enhanced curses library found; disable TUI])
else
AC_MSG_WARN([no enhanced curses library found; disabling TUI])
fi
fi
fi
fi
So shouldn't the right check be this:
if test x"$curses_found" != xyes; then
ac_cv_search_tgetent="none required"
CONFIG_OBS="$CONFIG_OBS windows-termcap.o"
fi ;;
?
Thanks,
Pedro Alves