This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] "info source" now includes producer string

> From: Doug Evans <>
> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 12:41:52 -0800
> bash$ g++ -g -Og -o hello
> bash$ gdb hello
> (gdb) start
> (gdb) info source
> Current source file is
> Compilation directory is /home/dje
> Located in /home/dje/
> Contains 8 lines.
> Source language is c++.
> Producer is GNU C++ 4.8.2 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -g -Og -fstack-protector.
> Compiled with DWARF 2 debugging format.
> Does not include preprocessor macro info.


> 	* NEWS: "info source" command now display producer string if present.

> --- a/gdb/NEWS
> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ VAX running Ultrix 			vax-*-ultrix*
>    and "assf"), have been removed.  Use the "sharedlibrary" command, or
>    its alias "share", instead.
> +* The "info source" command now displays the producer string if it was
> +  present in the debug info.

I wonder whether we should replace "producer" with something less
abstract.  Would "compilation command line" be accurate enough?

> --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> @@ -16279,6 +16279,8 @@ its length, in lines,
>  @item
>  which programming language it is written in,
>  @item
> +if the debug information provides it, the program that compiled the file,

Not just the program, but also its command line, right?

Okay with those fixed.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]