This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GCC switch to C11 causes many testsuite compiler diagnostics
- From: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- To: sandra at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:28:42 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: GCC switch to C11 causes many testsuite compiler diagnostics
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <544BD7E6 dot 1050602 at codesourcery dot com>
> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 11:03:34 -0600
> From: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
>
> Comparing my latest nios2 test results (with Pedro's thread patch) with
> those from a checkout a couple weeks old, I noticed I had some new
> ERRORs due to apparent compilation failures. I tracked this down to the
> recent change on GCC mainline (r216247) to make the default C dialect
> GNU11, which enables -Wimplicit-int and -Wimplicit-function-declaration
> by default. I started working on a patch to fix the offending
> testcases, but realized that there are hundreds of them. :-(
>
> So, before I invest a lot more time on this, is updating the GDB
> testsuite to use a more modern C dialect the Right Thing To Do? I'm
> also wondering if it's really necessary to support compilers that can't
> handle function prototypes in the testsuite (not defining PROTOTYPES
> seems to be the default, in fact).
We've quite deliberately kept around a variety of C dialects and
coding styles to make sure GDB works with whatever style people use.
Having the majority of the tests use K&R style function declarations
is probably not so useful anymore. But there are some tests that
deliberately use K&_R style code to test whether GDB handles them
properly. So blind conversion is probably not a good idea.