This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: asm-source.exp link options in case of armv7b target


On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Victor Kamensky
<victor.kamensky@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Yao,
>
> On 23 October 2014 23:05, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>>> +    "armv7b-*-*" {
>>> +     set asm-arch arm
>>> +     append link-flags " -be8"
>>> +    }
>>
>> We can't tell whether "-be8" is needed from the target triplet.
>> Considering multi-lib, "-be8" is needed for one multilib, but not
>> for the other.
>
> Any executable/library that runs on big endian V7 *must* be linked
> with -be8 option. Otherwise it simply won't run. In any other multilib
> option vfp, neon, etc -be8 must be set. Basically, in big endian case
> gcc/gas generates data and instructions in big endian
> format but ARM V7 requires that instruction should be little endian
> format. It is linker that does instructions byte swap. If -be8 flag
> is not passed during link while running on ARM V7 big endian target
> executable with crash with SIGILL. If link happens through gcc, then
> -be8 always passed for non relocatable code by compiler. In this
> particular case link happens directly with linker and -be8 is not
> default, so it is needed. One may argue that -be8 for final
> executables in ARM V7 BE target should be default even for
> linker, but it is not the current case ...
>
> Also note that you have plenty examples in the same test
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.asm/asm-source.exp
> that do very similar things. For example:
>
>     "powerpc64le-*" {
>         set asm-arch powerpc64le
>         set asm-flags "-a64 -I${srcdir}/${subdir} $obj_include"
>         append link-flags " -m elf64lppc"
>     }
>
> Why "-m elf64lppc" is set for powerpc64le target? I suspect
> by very similar reasons.


Yes and no.  For PowerPC64 little-endian is Linux only so it will
never have a multi-libs that support both little-endian and
big-endian.  While for arm*-*-*, you can have a bare metal env and
that could have a multi-lib for both little and big endian.

This is true for MIPS too.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski


>
>> Maybe, you can fix your problem by running tests via LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET,
>>
>> $ make check RUNTESTFLAGS='LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET=-be8'
>>
>> or you can create your own board file foo.exp, and add
>>
>> set_board_info ldflags  "-be8"
>
> I don't feel very strong about it, and definitely I can workaround
> this issue or just ignore the failure. It just seemed that it was very
> easy to fix.
>
> If you are still not convinced by above argument, yes,
> let's just drop it. Please let me know you final thoughts. We
> will proceed accordingly. I am fine either way.
>
> Thanks,
> Victor
>
>> $ make check RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=foo'
>>
>> --
>> Yao (éå)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]