This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove spurious exceptions.h inclusions
- From: Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat dot com>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 10:45:31 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Remove spurious exceptions.h inclusions
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1409586154-16196-1-git-send-email-gbenson at redhat dot com> <1409586154-16196-2-git-send-email-gbenson at redhat dot com> <CADPb22RcwUGPEwGGc7hG=4R0KvRV9axKDbQ6Nu1PHys5Nk=t8A at mail dot gmail dot com>
Doug Evans wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com> wrote:
> > defs.h includes utils.h, and utils.h includes exceptions.h. All
> > GDB .c files include defs.h as their first line, so no file other
> > than utils.h needs to include exceptions.h. This commit removes
> > all such inclusions.
> >
> > Doug, I Cc'd you on this one as you asked me to avoid giant
> > mechanical ChangeLog entries but I couldn't figure out how I'd
> > rewrite this one.
>
> For reference sake,
> I said that for two reasons:
> 1) to save you some typing
> 2) to keep the S/N ratio of the ChangeLog file from dropping, and
> in this case from dropping significantly. Yikes!
>
> > gdb/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * ada-lang.c: Do not include exceptions.h.
> > * ada-valprint.c: Likewise.
> > * amd64-tdep.c: Likewise.
> > [...]
>
> I realize one of the guidelines for changelogs is to document every
> file that's changed, but if we can agree that "All callers updated."
> can apply to all callers in all files, then I don't see why we
> couldn't be ok with something like the following for this case:
>
> * All .c files: Do not include exceptions.h.
>
> Yeah, it's not pedantically correct, not all .c files were touched.
> But I can live with that given the alternative.
I'll use this wording next time.
Thanks,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/