This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri 08 Aug 2014 09:05:10 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > > Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, > > monaka@monami-software.com Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 22:52:57 -0400 > > > > so the first question is, is this scenario important to us ? or do we > > consider people dealing with cross-gdb's to be on their own and to figure > > out documentation skew problems themselves ? > > I see no documentation skews here. The GDB manual documents (barring > errors that should be reported and fixed) describes all of its > versions, including cross-gdb. i described the skews in my other e-mail which you responded to. your `info gdb` obviously only describes that specific version of gdb. the further away your cross version gets (newer or older), the more the manual does not help but even confuses. you can't even use the online gdb manual because that only reflects the very latest versions (unlike say gcc which archives the manual for every release online). that leaves people with `man $target-gdb` which only describes the command line interface. > > lumping it into the category of "if you're > > cross-compiling/debugging, you know what you're doing" doesn't fly > > as there a _lot_ of people who do cross work and know very little > > here -- someone else is responsible for building/packaging the > > toolchain and they were just given it and told "use xxx-gcc and > > xxx-gdb". > > I don't see how people who know very little could ever be able to work > with GDB, or even with a cross-compiler, for that matter. But I guess > we will have to agree to disagree here. then you obviously haven't dealt with real world customers ;). it isn't that they can't look up and find information (eventually). but providing a state where they predestined to fail isn't exactly great. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |