On 07/01/2014 03:56 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
So it looks like we are taking a different route and GDB ends up
catching an error before displaying the optimized out information, thus
not matching what the testcase expects.
I could add a different pattern to the testcase and that would solve the
couple failures i see, but i wonder if we should tweak the testcase to
dodge optimizations?
Hi Luis,
Andrew Burgess had a patch changing "<error reading variable: value has
been optimized out>" to "<optimized out>" in this thread,
PATCH: error reading variable: value has been optimized out
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00715.html
so I think "<optimized out>" is the right direction to go. We should
fix gdb rather than update test case to match the current output, IMO.