This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- From: Ajit Kumar Agarwal <ajit dot kumar dot agarwal at xilinx dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Michael Eager <eager at eagercon dot com>, Vinod Kathail <vinodk at xilinx dot com>, Vidhumouli Hunsigida <vidhum at xilinx dot com>, Nagaraju Mekala <nmekala at xilinx dot com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:28:59 +0000
- Subject: RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.60.83) smtp dot mailfrom=ajit dot kumar dot agarwal at xilinx dot com;
- References: <fe2ea02f-37b9-4ebe-acd4-6d1192c26358 at BN1AFFO11FD059 dot protection dot gbl> <53A023B1 dot 5000105 at redhat dot com> <859f27cb-8c46-46c1-9625-7287c60f3ae9 at BY2FFO11FD007 dot protection dot gbl> <53A1ABF0 dot 9080004 at redhat dot com> <74281fd5-518a-4d7f-977a-6fa1320f6db9 at BY2FFO11FD016 dot protection dot gbl> <53A1B61F dot 9080803 at redhat dot com> <736c2e0d-6ff1-40c3-8120-dc6f5d91e6b1 at BL2FFO11FD052 dot protection dot gbl> <53A8290A dot 1050701 at redhat dot com> <ffd28f14-2c96-471f-a2c8-4f35b010727d at BN1AFFO11FD006 dot protection dot gbl> <53A94147 dot 4050700 at redhat dot com> <57ebe4b0-83eb-4208-9778-472ecf0048d4 at BY2FFO11FD038 dot protection dot gbl> <53A96993 dot 5040804 at redhat dot com> <109c35c1-e2f6-430f-9235-c6c82a93daf1 at BL2FFO11FD009 dot protection dot gbl> <53A97330 dot 4080708 at redhat dot com> <aff81eb4-90b2-4509-8790-6fcbede578b1 at BL2FFO11FD005 dot protection dot gbl> <53B1420A dot 40501 at redhat dot com> <d1f89215-a136-496d-9547-34a8066646c4 at BN1AFFO11FD055 dot protection dot gbl> <53B1488B dot 7070007 at redhat dot com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Pedro Alves [mailto:palves@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 4:53 PM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Michael Eager; Vinod Kathail; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
On 06/30/2014 12:13 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pedro Alves [mailto:palves@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 4:25 PM
> To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Michael Eager; Vinod Kathail;
> Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
> Subject: Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
>
> On 06/30/2014 11:32 AM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
>> Signed-off-by:Ajit Agarwal ajitkum@xilinx.com
>>
>>>> In this case is it correct to say
>>>> If (tdesc == NULL)
>>>> tdesc = tdesc_microblaze;
>>>>
>>>> instead of tdesc_microblaze_with_stack_protect?
>>>>>> Yes.
>> Instead of tdesc_microblaze_with_stack_protect if I use tdesc_microblaze the "G Packet message is too long" error is not resolved.
>
>>> Then it sounds like the G packet size guesses you're adding aren't actually triggering. Why?
>
> I have checked the guesses are actually triggering as it works fine
> with backward compatibility with the Designs there is no stack-protect registers. For the Design that has the Stack protect register, it reports the message " G packet too long ".
>>If the G guess is triggering OK, and so GDB picks the description with the stack protect registers based on the G packet size, why would the default target description matter at all? If it >>does, then something sounds broken.
In Microblaze Port the gdbarch_info has tdesc always set to NULL. Thus the gdbarch_init doesn't populates the register info based feature target description. Though the microblaze_register_g_packet_guesses is called by gdbarch_init and register the guesses, but the gdbarch_info.tdesc == NULL always and features target description info is populated based on default target description.
>>What are you doing different from the other ports that use this mechanism?
In Microblaze port as compared to other architecture port lacking the function microblaze_read_description which sets the tdesc and the architecture set up based the Linux Kernel and Ptrace parameters. The other architecture like ARM and MIPS has arm_read_description and arm_linux_read_description which sets the tdesc info current()->Process.
>>Please debug this a bit further.
--
Pedro Alves
- References:
- [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- RE: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.
- Re: [Patch, microblaze]: Fix for remote G Packet message too long error for baremetal.