This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 0/7] Refactor shared code in {i386,amd64}-linux-nat.c
- From: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- To: gbenson at redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:28:35 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Refactor shared code in {i386,amd64}-linux-nat.c
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1403860209-475-1-git-send-email-gbenson at redhat dot com>
> From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:10:02 +0100
>
> Hi all,
>
> This series refactors the shared code in {i386,amd64}-linux-nat.c into
> the new files x86-linux-nat.[ch] and i386-linux-nat.h. The first five
> patches remove spurious changes between the files so that the code to
> be shared is identical:
>
> 1/7 - Rename identical functions
> 2/7 - Merge {i386,amd64}_linux_read_description
> 3/7 - Merge ps_get_thread_area
> 4/7 - Pull out common parts of _initialize_{i386,amd64}_linux_nat
> 5/7 - Comment and whitespace changes
>
> The sixth patch moves the shared code into the new files and does all
> the makefile and build system updates:
>
> 6/7 - Move duplicated code into new files
>
> The seventh patch tidies the blocks of #include directives at the
> tops of {i386,amd64}-linux-nat.c:
>
> 7/7 - Tidy #include lists
>
> This final patch is not strictly necessary for the series, but it
> makes things tidier.
>
> Is this ok to commit?
Sorry, no. Perhaps more code can be shared between i386-linux-nat.c
and amd64-linux-nat.c, but this goes too far and turns things into
#ifdef spagetthi. It also breaks established naming conventions.