This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 11/15] Rename functions and make nonstatic as necessary
- From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra at google dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:03:25 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] Rename functions and make nonstatic as necessary
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1403014378-4349-1-git-send-email-gbenson at redhat dot com> <1403014378-4349-12-git-send-email-gbenson at redhat dot com> <CAGyQ6gwYauHffA+R8yd=LoRSB2VPZdEDy7HsQ0-dt+jqxuhFHg at mail dot gmail dot com> <20140618132832 dot GA6225 at blade dot nx> <53A19A53 dot 6030107 at redhat dot com>
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06/18/2014 02:28 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
>> Siva Chandra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:12 AM, Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> This commit renames the functions that are to be shared.
>>>> Functions to be shared that were static are made nonstatic.
>>>
>>> I thinking making the functions nonstatic in this part was not
>>> correct. The build currently fails when built with
>>> "-Werror=missing-prototypes" as 14/15 has not yet been committed.
>>
>> My apologies Siva.
>>
>> Pedro, should I commit the remaining piece now, and work on the
>> i386_insert_hw_breakpoint as a separate patch?
>
> As you've committed the header patch already, I think the issue
> is actually already fixed?
Yes, I just checked; the issue is already fixed.