This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] Split create-breakpoint! into make-breakpoint, register-breakpoint!
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Doug Evans <xdje42 at gmail dot com>
- Cc: ludo at gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:05:20 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] Split create-breakpoint! into make-breakpoint, register-breakpoint!
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <m3egz5cm1v dot fsf at sspiff dot org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:53:48 -0700
>
> In keeping with the splitting of object creation and registration into
> two separate pieces, this does the same for breakpoints.
> "Consistency Is Good".
>
> There hasn't been an FSF release of gdb+guile yet so I think it's ok
> to remove create-breakpoint! here.
OK for the documentation part, but is delete-breakpoint a better name
than breakpoint-delete?.
A question: how does one discard breakpoint objects so that they no
longer exist? It seems that breakpoint-delete! only "deregisters" the
breakpoint, but there's no way to undo the effect of the
create-breakpoint procedure.
Thanks.