[PING] [PATCH 00/11] Regset rework preparations part 1

[Andreas Arnez <arnez at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>]

On Thu, May 15 2014, Andreas Arnez wrote:

> This is the first half of the "regset rework preparations" series I've
> posted as RFC:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html

On Wed, May 14 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote:

>> From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:13:26 +0200
>> 
>> Although there was feedback for some of the patches in this series
>> (https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html), many are
>> still uncommented.  I'd really appreciate more feedback, particularly
>> for the architecture-specific changes.
>
> Sorry, I've not been able to find time to process your reply on my
> review of patch 12 yet and won't be able to for the next 1.5 weeks or
> so.  But perhaps you could move ahead with the diffs that don't depend
> on that one which seem useful in their own right.
>
>> Patches 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 (AARCH64, ARM, MIPS, MN10300, and SCORE): No
>> comments yet.
>> 
>> > * Patch 9 ("SPARC: Rename register maps from "*regset" to "*regmap"):
>> >   Adjusts naming, to avoid name clashes in patch 10.
>> 
>> Approved by Mark Kettenis:
>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00038.html
>
> I don't really expect any response for MN10300 and SCORE.  I'd give it
> a few days to give people with an interest in ARM and MIPS the
> opportunity to repsond, but feel free to move ahead with 3, 4, 6, 7
> and 8 after that.

As suggested, I've waited a few additional days now for comments on
patches 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8.  Apart from those I believe everything else
in this series was approved already.

OK to push?