Re: [RFA 0/9] Explicit locations v2 - Introduction

[Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>]

On 05/15/2014 10:56 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:

> I did a quick testing session of those patches. First of all, it passes
> our internal testsuite on x86_64-linux :).

Great news, thank you!

> The only part that I found to be odd was that I tried to be a little
> more selective in which operator I wanted to break on, by specifying
> the line number:
>
>      (gdb) b -f ops."-" -l 15
>      Breakpoint 4 at 0x401da4: -f ops."-" -l 15. (2 locations)
>
> I still got 2 locations, one of them not being at line 15:
>
>      (gdb) info break
>      4       breakpoint [...] <MULTIPLE>
>      4.1                [...]   0x0000000000401da4 in ops."-" at ops.adb:15
>      4.2                [...]   0x0000000000401ff3 in ops."-" at ops.adb:109
>
> But maybe this part wasn't part of this patch's objectives yet...

Right. Linespecs don't support this yet, either. This patch was simply 
to be at parity with linespec. When linespecs gain the ability, explicit 
should, too.

Keith