This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] handle VLA in a struct or union
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: "Agovic\, Sanimir" <sanimir dot agovic at intel dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches\ at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 11:00:47 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] handle VLA in a struct or union
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1399574816-12845-1-git-send-email-tromey at redhat dot com> <1399574816-12845-3-git-send-email-tromey at redhat dot com> <0377C58828D86C4588AEEC42FC3B85A71D86BED8 at IRSMSX105 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com> <87y4yaslrv dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <0377C58828D86C4588AEEC42FC3B85A71D86CADD at IRSMSX105 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com>
>>>>> "Sanimir" == Agovic, Sanimir <sanimir.agovic@intel.com> writes:
Sanimir> As you have pointed out the limitation of vla within arrays,
Sanimir> this might as well serve as a test case that we deal with it.
>>
>> I didn't understand this one, sorry...
>>
Sanimir> Add a test for the following limitation:
Ok, I see.
I suppose I can add a test for the error case.
But, I don't like to add new [kx]fails to the tree, if that's what you
meant.
Tom