This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 2/4] Error on bad count number
- From: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 17:38:19 +0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Error on bad count number
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1394023608-10761-1-git-send-email-yao at codesourcery dot com> <1394023608-10761-3-git-send-email-yao at codesourcery dot com> <20140305142939 dot GB16858 at adacore dot com> <531749BA dot 8050806 at redhat dot com> <5318456D dot 3010709 at codesourcery dot com> <53186842 dot 9030704 at redhat dot com>
On 03/06/2014 08:21 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> AFAICS, get_number handles negative numbers. E.g.,
>
Yes, get_number handles negative, but is it expected for get_number
to handle negative?
> (top-gdb) ignore -6 1
> Will ignore next crossing of breakpoint -6.
Shouldn't GDB emit an error on the negative input? Do we have any
case that negative is valid? Note that get_number_or_range errors on
negative.
(gdb) thread apply -2-1 bt
negative value
--
Yao (éå)