This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v1 02/36] Guile extension language: doc additions
- From: ludo at gnu dot org (Ludovic CourtÃs)
- To: Doug Evans <xdje42 at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, "gdb-patches\ at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:47:33 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/36] Guile extension language: doc additions
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52b9da59 dot 64ab440a dot 0b0b dot 7e1c at mx dot google dot com> <83ha9w68av dot fsf at gnu dot org> <87sit4kb1t dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAP9bCMRGrCpY4nYW4Egaeai+DLcYk2o3i-6NTVPKriZjFfEMTA at mail dot gmail dot com>
Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com> skribis:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Ludovic CourtÃs <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> skribis:
>>
>>>> +Guile version 2.0.9 is well tested, earlier 2.0 versions are not.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure we should say this in the manual.
>>
>> In practice the parts that are used (mostly the C API) have seen few
>> additions over 2.0, so itâs likely that it would work with any 2.0.x.
>>
>>>> +The implementation uses Guile's @code{smob} (small object)
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> This should be in @dfn, as it's new terminology.
>>
>> Better yet:
>>
>> (@pxref{Smobs,,, guile, GNU Guile Reference Manual})
>
> fyi, I'm finding I need to use guile2 here instead of guile in order
> for info to find the guile docs.
> I presume that's ok.
Yes. I donât remember: are you targeting 1.8 as well?
Ludoâ.