This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet
- From: Hui Zhu <hui_zhu at mentor dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:53:35 +0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let gdbserver doesn't tell GDB it support target-side breakpoint conditions and commands if it doesn't support 'Z' packet
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5265022F dot 8060203 at mentor dot com> <52654A2C dot 9010202 at redhat dot com> <529707C7 dot 4040504 at mentor dot com> <5298AE7C dot 6020607 at redhat dot com> <529C80D2 dot 2080608 at mentor dot com> <529C9B42 dot 20600 at redhat dot com> <529D62F7 dot 80701 at mentor dot com>
On 12/03/13 12:49, Hui Zhu wrote:
On 12/02/13 22:37, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 12/02/2013 12:45 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
On 11/29/13 23:10, Pedro Alves wrote:
On 11/28/2013 09:07 AM, Hui Zhu wrote:
+ if (have_target_target_side_commands)
This can now just be:
if (!VEC_empty (agent_expr_p, bp_tgt->tcommands))
OK with that change.
+ {
+ warning (_("\
+Target doesn't support breakpoints that have target side commands."));
I was doing to suggest making this an error instead, that
insert_bp_location would print the error string, but that's
only true for hw breakpoints... insert_bp_location's error
handling is quite messy. For instance, if this breakpoint
is in a a shared library, this will disable the breakpoint,
even though the cause of the error is clearly not that the
shared library disappeared (i.e., not a memory error).
+ return -1;
+ }
Updated the patch according to your comments.
But you switched to "error" anyway? Above I was saying that I
was going that suggest it, but then explained why I didn't think
it would work. Was I wrong?
The reason is insert_bp_location doesn't have code to handle this error. I make a new patch that include this code.
Please help me review it.
And I make a patch for dprintf.exp and mi-dprintf.exp to make test OK on the target that doesn't support "Zx" packets.
The patches were tested and pass regression test on X86_64 and PPC.
(It's best to stick to one patch per email, otherwise things
end up confusing. I suggest looking into git send-email.)
OK. I will post new version of this patch in another mail.
Thanks,
Hui
This patch is for dprintf.exp and mi-dprintf.exp to make test OK on the target that doesn't support "Zx" packets.
Thanks,
Hui
2013-12-03 Hui Zhu <hui@codesourcery.com>
PR gdb/16101
* gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Add check for the the gdbserver of some
architecture doesn't support some "Zx" doesn't support some "Zx"
packets.
* gdb.mi/mi-dprintf.exp: Ditto.
* lib/mi-support.exp: Add check for continue get error.
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp
@@ -108,6 +108,26 @@ gdb_test_multiple "set dprintf-style age
}
}
+# Continue with target-side breakpoint commands will get error if GDB
+# work with The gdbserver of some architecture doesn't support some "Zx"
+# packets.
+if $target_can_dprintf {
+ gdb_run_cmd
+
+ gdb_test "" "Breakpoint"
+
+ set msg "continue with target-side breakpoint commands"
+ gdb_test_multiple "continue" $msg {
+ -re "Cannot insert breakpoint $decimal:.*\r\n.*\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ set target_can_dprintf 0
+ pass "$msg - cannot do"
+ }
+ -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass "$msg - can do"
+ }
+ }
+}
+
if $target_can_dprintf {
gdb_run_cmd
@@ -120,7 +140,7 @@ if $target_can_dprintf {
gdb_test_sequence "info breakpoints" "dprintf info 2" {
"\[\r\n\]Num Type Disp Enb Address +What"
"\[\r\n\]2 breakpoint"
- "\[\r\n\]\tbreakpoint already hit 2 times"
+ "\[\r\n\]\tbreakpoint already hit 3 times"
"\[\r\n\]3 dprintf"
"\[\r\n\]\tbreakpoint already hit 2 times"
"\[\r\n\] agent-printf \"At foo entry\\\\n\""
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-dprintf.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-dprintf.exp
@@ -139,6 +139,16 @@ gdb_expect {
}
}
+# Continue with target-side breakpoint commands will get error if GDB
+# work with The gdbserver of some architecture doesn't support some "Zx"
+# packets.
+if $target_can_dprintf {
+ if {[mi_run_cmd] == -1} {
+ pass "continue with target-side breakpoint commands - cannot do"
+ set target_can_dprintf 0
+ }
+}
+
if $target_can_dprintf {
mi_run_cmd
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/mi-support.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/mi-support.exp
@@ -843,6 +843,7 @@ proc mi_run_cmd_full {use_mi_command arg
send_gdb "${run_prefix}continue\n"
gdb_expect 60 {
-re "${run_match}\\^running\[\r\n\]+\\*running,thread-id=\"\[^\"\]+\"\r\n$mi_gdb_prompt" {}
+ -re "\\^error.*\r\n$mi_gdb_prompt" { return -1 }
default {}
}
return 0