This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Setting parity for remote serial
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Yurij Grechishhev <yurij dot grechishhev at gmail dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:03:35 +0100
- Subject: Re: Setting parity for remote serial
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAAyhtXRSWTdpDc4jiZ2k5zWCNUXUzRxNokN1F_aRdMfuWGsBHQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <87bo6affrh dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <524ECCBB dot 5050307 at gmail dot com> <CAAyhtXQBSOz8sjxSmqGRQNtXHeOJpszMEYhRGyBydBGr-GkZCw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20131008035636 dot GC3092 at adacore dot com>
[tweaking subject to draw others' attention]
On 10/08/2013 04:56 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>>> IOW, IMO, if we add "set serial parity",
>>> we should also alias "set remotebaud" to "set serial baud", and whatever
>>> other commands would make sense (which should be really simple to do).
>>
>> That would be great. But it's more comprehensive patch that I have done.
>> Can we add all "set remotefoo" commands and then alias them
>> to "set serial foo" at once?
>> Related discussion:
>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2001-09/msg00358.html
>
> I'd rather we do it right the first time. If we're a go with
> the "set serial baud" command, I don't mind taking care of
> that part. As Pedro hints, it's a fairly easy change to make.
>
> Pedro, should we go ahead? It's only been a day or two, but we haven't
> had any objection so far.
Yeah, I think so.
Thanks,
--
Pedro Alves