This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] [DOC] Mention what happens when the thread of a thread-specific breakpoint is gone.
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 18:59:00 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [DOC] Mention what happens when the thread of a thread-specific breakpoint is gone.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1380898896-16767-1-git-send-email-palves at redhat dot com> <83y569apvb dot fsf at gnu dot org> <524F00E6 dot 9010104 at gmail dot com>
On 10/04/2013 06:54 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> That was on purpose. It's what GDB says too. That's because
> there are other ways for a thread to disappear other than
> a regular thread exit, such as "detach", "disconnect"
> or gdb losing the remote connection, etc. The thread hasn't
> really exited in those cases.
I guess that means I should update the docs to clarify that. :-)
A sec while I prepare a new patch.
--
Pedro Alves