This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA, doc RFA] work around gold/15646
- From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 09:57:31 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFA, doc RFA] work around gold/15646
- References: <yjt28v25ixqi dot fsf at ruffy dot mtv dot corp dot google dot com> <87y58y7fqx dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <20986 dot 63965 dot 358882 dot 782184 at ruffy dot mtv dot corp dot google dot com> <83iozozl4v dot fsf at gnu dot org>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
>> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 17:14:21 -0700
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>> +@item
>> +Version 8 specifies that the performance issues in
>> +Gold generated version 7 indices are fixed.
>
> I would use
>
> Version 8 fixes the performance issues in Gold generated version-7
> indices.
One has to be careful though. Gold currently does not generate
version-8 indices and I cannot give an ETA of when it will.
>> +Gold generated version 7 indices have the following problems:
>
> Are these part of the "performance issues" mentioned above? If so,
> "performance" is not really accurate. If this is not fixed in version
> 8, then we should say so.
>
> Otherwise, fine with me.
>
> Thanks.
As I say, Gold does not generate version-8 indices and I don't want to
speak about something that doesn't exist.