This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 1/5] Code for nds32 target
- From: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Wei-cheng Wang <cole945 at gmail dot com>
- Cc: <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:34:50 +0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Code for nds32 target
- References: <CAPmZyH4TFFOvyis+so2=sd0oNg3-m0Kj1H-vske=WyK57TLqVQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <51DB8D14 dot 20205 at codesourcery dot com> <51DC552D dot 3060900 at gmail dot com>
On 07/10/2013 02:23 AM, Wei-cheng Wang wrote:
Target description can not describe a enum-typed bit-field.
If bit-field struct is used, I could not specify the type for
a bit-field.
<struct id="id" size="size">
<field name="name" start="start" end="end"/>
...
</struct>
If I want to specify field type, I couldn't specify size of a field.
<struct id="id">
<field name="name" type="type"/>
...
</struct>
FAOD, this works in general. See testsuite/gdb.xml/extra-regs.xml.
However, TYPE can't be flags. For example, I hack 'i386_eflags' in
i386/32bit-core.xml, which splits eflags registers into three groups (or
types),
<flags id="i386_eflags_1" size="1">
<field name="CF" start="0" end="0"/>
<field name="" start="1" end="1"/>
<field name="PF" start="2" end="2"/>
<field name="AF" start="4" end="4"/>
<field name="ZF" start="6" end="6"/>
<field name="SF" start="7" end="7"/>
</flags>
<flags id="i386_eflags_2" size="1">
<field name="TF" start="0" end="0"/>
<field name="IF" start="1" end="1"/>
<field name="DF" start="2" end="2"/>
<field name="OF" start="3" end="3"/>
<field name="NT" start="4" end="4"/>
</flags>
<flags id="i386_eflags_3" size="1">
<field name="RF" start="0" end="0"/>
<field name="VM" start="1" end="1"/>
<field name="AC" start="2" end="2"/>
<field name="VIF" start="3" end="3"/>
<field name="VIP" start="4" end="4"/>
<field name="ID" start="5" end="5"/>
</flags>
<struct id="i386_eflags" size="4">
<field name="a" type="i386_eflags_1"/>
<field name="b" type="i386_eflags_2"/>
<field name="c" type="i386_eflags_3"/>
</struct>
Then I get an error:
Explicitly sized type can not contain non-bitfield "a"
It is a limitation of <struct> and <flags>, which was mentioned in the
patch submission.
[patch] Add support for <struct> and <flags> in target descriptions
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-02/msg00542.html
I can't evaluate how much efforts are needed to fix this limitation.
All I want is to display a register in such format.
(gdb) p $cr0
$1 = {CFGID = [ PERF_EXT 16_EXT PERF_EXT2 COP_EXT STR_EXT ],
REV = 16, CPUID = N13}
(cr0 consist of config flags, revision number and CPU ID.)
With some hack (comment out the code which throws error) in
xml-tdesc.c:tdesc_start_field, I can get something similar to yours,
(gdb) p $eflags
$1 = {a = [ SF ], b = [ IF ], c = [ ]}
Probably, it is what you want. Looks target description is quite
'friendly' to be extended, but I don't know what to start with or how
much work is needed.
--
Yao (éå)