This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Share more common target structures between gdb and gdbserver
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: lgustavo at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: "'gdb-patches\ at sourceware dot org'" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:18:12 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Share more common target structures between gdb and gdbserver
- References: <51E595A0 dot 6090500 at codesourcery dot com>
>>>>> "Luis" == Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com> writes:
Luis> While doing some research about the remote fork following feature, i
Luis> noticed there was some duplication of target data structures for GDB
Luis> and gdbserver.
Luis> This patch moves the shareable code/data structures to
Luis> common/target-common.* and makes both GDB and gdbserver target files
Luis> reference the header common/target-common.h.
Thanks.
Luis> OK?
A couple of trivial nits.
Luis> diff --git a/gdb/common/target-common.c b/gdb/common/target-common.c
Luis> new file mode 100644
Luis> index 0000000..a7ee3e2
Luis> --- /dev/null
Luis> +++ b/gdb/common/target-common.c
Luis> +/* Return a pretty printed form of target_waitstatus.
Luis> + Space for the result is malloc'd, caller must free. */
Luis> +
Luis> +#include "target-common.h"
I think common .c files ought to start with:
#ifdef GDBSERVER
#include "server.h"
#else
#include "defs.h"
#endif
Not pretty, but it seems to be the standard.
Luis> +/* Generally, what has the program done? */
Luis> +enum target_waitkind
Luis> +{
[...]
Luis> + };
This line is mis-indented.
I thought at first that it was this way originally, but you've
reindented the body of the enum generally, just not this line.
Luis> @@ -429,6 +427,7 @@ vec_h = $(srcdir)/../common/vec.h
Luis> gdb_vecs_h = $(srcdir)/../common/gdb_vecs.h
Luis> host_defs_h = $(srcdir)/../common/host-defs.h
Luis> libiberty_h = $(srcdir)/../../include/libiberty.h
Luis> +target_common_h = $(srcdir)/../common/target-common.h
I don't think this is needed.
This is ok with the above fixed.
Thanks for working on this.
Tom