This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] dwarf2read.c: Don't assume uint32_t is unsigned int on all hosts.
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 11:56:45 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] dwarf2read.c: Don't assume uint32_t is unsigned int on all hosts.
- References: <20130521203421 dot 23721 dot 93618 dot stgit at brno dot lan> <CADPb22TzeQEanUGOMcFBJrStDYkk5zRUE2Fht_c_d5mQAYM7sw at mail dot gmail dot com> <519C932E dot 7000601 at redhat dot com> <CADPb22S0sYeTv+9_gsNO=3axHabLjgtwuyuNpyniLUfwwv9aCQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <519CEDF9 dot 7060000 at redhat dot com> <CADPb22Tw2b788uihCJjjnmKKGjgm525vmpThMzEHZ0fpSTqgzw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130523055353 dot GC4017 at adacore dot com> <519E0484 dot 9040103 at redhat dot com> <87a9nlg5gt dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <CADPb22Sy6Pzf7tm+5sYr+Rs0OVHtNQKVzYKBR=jDR=8rfa0QDQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
Doug> It's not obvious to me to use pulongest to print uint32_t, so if
Doug> y'all are willing to let me check in a patch that is otherwise
Doug> obvious but happens to not use pulongest ... "works for me".
Doug> ['cus I can't promise to keep this one in cache]
It is fine by me. I think these little host differences are a minor
problem at worst. They are ordinarily trivial to fix.
Tom