This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sunday 24 March 2013 19:23:28 Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > From: Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com> > > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 15:45:27 +0100 > > > > This came in after I was done email last night. My test > > run finished overnight with no horribly bad issues. I have no idea > > what the make check results should be though and they could be > > because I simply ran "make check" with no board specified and > > no gcc for the target installed. > > This would be no news to *you*, but for the record: > > You need a board (make check RUNTESTFLAGS=--target_board=$board > with e.g. board=cris-sim). All boards are in "recent" > dejagnu-1.5 IIRC and most in ancient dejagnu-1.4.4. You need > installed binutils (e.g. in some temp location added to PATH for > the duration of the test-run) for each sim configuration as > mentioned. I don't run with target gcc; not needed for the > level of smoke test I'm after and I guess not for this change > either. that's not entirely true. many (all but cris?) sims run & pass just fine without needing to explicitly pass magic flags. i know the Blackfin and frv sims can build & run pretty much all their tests w/out requiring board flags. imo, requiring manual board selection like this is archaic for no good reason. i never test sims with specific flags, nor do i plan on starting. `make check- sim` is my limit of testing. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |