This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[obv] Fix new FAIL on 64-bit targets [Re: [PATCH 1/3] Test of breakpoint output for dprintf]


On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:53:01 +0100, Yao Qi wrote:
> 	* gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Check the output of 'info breakpoints'
> 	for dprintf.
> 	* gdb.mi/mi-breakpoint-changed.exp (test_insert_delete_modify):
> 	Check the fields in "=breakpoint-created" for dprintf.

It has FAIL on 64-bit targets:

gdb_expect_list pattern: /[^M
]Num     Type           Disp Enb Address    What/
info breakpoints^M
Num     Type           Disp Enb Address            What^M
2       breakpoint     keep y   0x0000000000400743 in main at ./gdb.base/dprintf.c:33^M
[...]
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/dprintf.exp: dprintf info 1 (pattern 1)


Checked in as obvious.


Thanks,
Jan


http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2013-01/msg00059.html

--- src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog	2013/01/11 00:31:56	1.3500
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog	2013/01/11 15:21:13	1.3501
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-01-11  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+	* gdb.base/dprintf.exp (dprintf info 1): Fix expectation on 64-bit
+	targets.
+
 2013-01-11  Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>
 
 	* gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Check the output of 'info breakpoints'
--- src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp	2013/01/11 00:31:58	1.7
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp	2013/01/11 15:21:14	1.8
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
   "Dprintf .*"
 
 gdb_test_sequence "info breakpoints" "dprintf info 1" {
-    "\[\r\n\]Num     Type           Disp Enb Address    What"
+    "\[\r\n\]Num     Type           Disp Enb Address +What"
     "\[\r\n\]2       breakpoint"
     "\[\r\n\]3       dprintf"
     "\[\r\n\]        printf \"At foo entry\\\\n\""


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]