This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"


>>>>> "Dodji" == Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> The alternative is something like type="catchpoint",catch-type="load".

Dodji> I tend to prefer this alternative, but really, I don't have any strong
Dodji> opinion about this.  I'd say that if the information about the different
Dodji> types of catchpoints is present, it's fine.

Dodji> Just curious, what would be the drawback of this alternative, compared
Dodji> to, say, type='catch-load'?

Just that it is wordier, and it seems odd to have two "type" fields.

I went ahead and did it this way.
I'll send new patches momentarily.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]