Re: [patch] validate binary before use

[Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski at qnx dot com>]

On 12-12-27 03:59 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:06:52 +0100, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> > build-id would be great if it was required by the standard
>
> GDB can check if it exists and do something as a fallback if it does not exist.
> Such as printing a warning and possibly also verifying the program headers, if
> compatibility with binaries from old toolchain and/or toolchain without
> configured ld --build-id is required in some situations (which I doubt).
>
>
> > and mapped into loadable segments.
>
> It is mapped, because one of its purposes is to get dumped into a core file.
> In fact there is a special care to make it always present in the first page.

Ok I didn't know that (we are not using it). In any case, what I am 
trying to do does not disqualify build-id (I'll use it in fact, if present).

Note also that I really want a solution that does *not* rely on section 
headers but rather only on load-time required stuff.

Thanks,

Aleksandar