This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] Fix for gdb.parameter('architecture') returning empty string
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Siva Chandra <sivachandra at google dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:18:52 -0600
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix for gdb.parameter('architecture') returning empty string
- References: <CAGyQ6gzRaxiQyM71_RaX7yRiUWYGrTUpmNKpd92=MRSxShJAgQ@mail.gmail.com>
>>>>> "Siva" == Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com> writes:
Siva> Currently, gdb.parameter ('architecture') and gdb.parameter ('endian')
Siva> return an empty string. Attached is a patch which fixes this. I am
Siva> not very sure if this is the cleanest fix, but I could not come up
Siva> with a better one.
Thanks for the patch.
I'm not certain that this patch is correct. Also I tend to think (but
of course I am willing to be convinced otherwise) that a different
direction would be preferable.
Siva> +static void
Siva> +on_architecture_change (struct gdbarch *arch)
Siva> +{
Siva> + architecture_string = gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (arch)->printable_name;
Siva> + set_endian_string (arch);
Siva> +}
Siva> + observer_attach_architecture_changed (on_architecture_change);
I suspect this means that gdb.parameter('architecture') will not always
show the same result as "show architecture".
Right now, in the auto case show_architecture will call
get_current_arch:
struct gdbarch *
get_current_arch (void)
{
if (has_stack_frames ())
return get_frame_arch (get_selected_frame (NULL));
else
return target_gdbarch;
}
But from what I can tell, the architecture-change observer is not
notified in every situation that might cause that function to return a
different result.
I think a better approach might be to address the problem of "auto" gdb
parameters more globally. For example, we could add a method to the
appropriate CLI object so that the Python could call this to get the
correct current value.
What do you think of that?
I don't think we'd have to convert all auto parameters at once.
However, this approach would make it easy to convert them as needed.
Tom