Re: [patch v2] gdb: add completion handler for "handle"

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> writes:

Mike> +  c = add_com ("handle", class_run, handle_command, _("\
Mike> +Handle signals: handle SIGNAL [KEYWORDS]\n\
Mike>  Args are signals and actions to apply to those signals.\n\
Mike>  Symbolic signals (e.g. SIGSEGV) are recommended but numeric signals\n\

I didn't see this in v3, but FWIW it is normal-ish now to add a usage
line.  Say, something like:

Change the way GDB handles signals.
Usage: handle SIGNAL [SIGNAL | KEYWORD]...

... or whatever.

Tom