This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [SH] regs command

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, macro at codesourcery dot com, thomas at codesourcery dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, kevinb at redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:37:57 -0700
Subject: Re: [SH] regs command
References: <87r4ukox0y.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120516190539.GZ10253@adacore.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1205162033380.11227@tp.orcam.me.uk> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1205170145070.11227@tp.orcam.me.uk> <201205171109.q4HB9Ljc005742@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1205171215290.11227@tp.orcam.me.uk> <20120517123827.GB10253@adacore.com> <201205171522.q4HFMWGM026439@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20120517154502.GE10253@adacore.com> <87zk96k2my.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

> I think the first deprecation/alias patch should go in.

Same here.

> I tend to agree with Mark that changing the init order in response to
> this problem is perhaps not wise.

OK, I think that settles it.

-- 
Joel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki

References:
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]