Re: [5/5] fix test suite for MI output

[Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>]

On 05/14/2012 01:01 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I'm not sure whether this is reasonable to do or not, so I pulled this
> patch out separately.

Preface: I'm not an MI user, but I do use varobj. This isn't a protest 
or other demand for action, but I felt compelled to add my $2E-10, in 
hopes of coaxing other users to offer an opinion.

> It is not too hard to fix varobj to disable this new setting, if that is
> preferable for some reason.

I really don't like this. UIs will now display arrays (what about other 
aggregate types like struct pointers?) this way, and in the context of 
varobj, it provides no additional information that the UI isn't already 
providing users:

  + my_array  (int [10])  0x12345678 <my_array>

Keith