This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Emit a warning for ineffective set VAR = EXP command

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: <Paul_Koning at Dell dot com>
Cc: <gingold at adacore dot com>, <macro at codesourcery dot com>, <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 14:37:27 -0600
Subject: Re: [RFA] Emit a warning for ineffective set VAR = EXP command
References: <8781499A-A489-42D0-80B1-75136331DBDB@adacore.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1205041958130.18334@tp.orcam.me.uk> <EFDD29C9-79FB-468E-B29B-C1783123E41D@adacore.com> <874nrryeap.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <CF16E66A-F946-449E-8764-71DDAF88D483@dell.com>

>>>>> "Paul" ==   <Paul_Koning@Dell.com> writes:

Paul> What would ++ do if your current language is Ada, or Fortran?
Paul> Complain about syntax error?

The expression is parsed according to the current language.
So, yes, syntax error, assuming this is invalid in Ada or Fortran.

Tom

References:
- Re: [RFA] Emit a warning for ineffective set VAR = EXP command
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: [RFA] Emit a warning for ineffective set VAR = EXP command
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: [RFA] Emit a warning for ineffective set VAR = EXP command
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFA] Emit a warning for ineffective set VAR = EXP command
  - From: Paul_Koning

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]