This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: set print object on should affect MI varobjs (PR mi/13393)

31.03.2012, 00:52, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>:
> Close, but not quite there yet.  The last piece we need to clarify is
> the "actual (derived) type of the object is set" part.  What do you
> mean by "type is set"?  This text describes the result returned by
> '-var-create', so did you mean to say that the actual type is
> mentioned in the tuple returned by this operation?  IOW, did you mean
> to point out that the 'type=TYPE' part of -var-create's output will
> mention the actual type as TYPE?

Yes, it is exactly what I meant. Can you help me with the better wording?


Thanks,
Anton.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]