This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Monday 19 March 2012 19:50:42 Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > > On Monday 19 March 2012 02:28:49 Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > > For mips-elf, there's just > > > > mips-elf is passing for me > > > > > FAIL: mips1 hilo-hazard-1.s (execution) > > > > the glob should eat the new signal string > > > > > And really, why removing the "program stopped with signal" > > > common part? I see no reason to not just adding it back. > > > > it wasn't removed. the signal is now additionally being decoded. > > > > before: program stopped with signal 5. > > after: program stopped with signal 5 (Trace/breakpoint trap). > > That's what you'd think (and that'd be an improvement), but the > message really is all gone. Is it a host issue? The tester > host is admittedly an aging installation, F 8 x86_64. if you run it manually, do you get the full string ? it's passing on my side just fine: spawn /usr/local/src/gnu/sourceware/build/build-mips/sim/testsuite/../mips/run hilo-hazard-1.s.x HILO: MULT: OP at 0x80010048 too close to MF at 0x80010044 program stopped with signal 6 (Aborted). PASS: mips1 hilo-hazard-1.s you can see the commit in question clearly doesn't remove the msg: --- a/sim/common/nrun.c +++ b/sim/common/nrun.c - fprintf (stderr, "program stopped with signal %d.\n", sigrc); + fprintf (stderr, "program stopped with signal %d (%s).\n", sigrc, + strsignal (sigrc)); maybe strsignal() is crashing ? what version of glibc ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |