This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: consolidate DWARF strings into libiberty

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:13:00 -0400
Subject: Re: RFA: consolidate DWARF strings into libiberty
References: <87k42lbvco.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201203151833.q2FIXeOs003077__40387.7084645957$1331836457$gmane$org@greed.delorie.com> <87d38dbtal.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201203151848.q2FImnAq004284__18018.6977530413$1331837385$gmane$org@greed.delorie.com> <871uotbscq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <CADPb22RdZoPSt9eV4b+jJHbYjNMSC=s1ZQih31+JTtrW4OJW-w@mail.gmail.com>

> But given the pushback for even one new library, I think we're
> unnecessarily slowing ourselves down.

I'm not opposed to libiberty becoming the kitchen sink, if that's what
people want.  If it does go that route, my reason for being a
libiberty maintainer no longer applies, and others who are more
kitchen-sink-minded should take over.

The only drawback to adding toplevel libraries is coordinating changes
among the toplevel configury.

References:
- RFA: consolidate DWARF strings into libiberty
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: consolidate DWARF strings into libiberty
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: consolidate DWARF strings into libiberty
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: consolidate DWARF strings into libiberty
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]