Re: [5/5] reimplement 'set print vtbl on'

[Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>]

On 03/15/2012 03:49 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:

> Pedro> We could consider making that unconditional?
> 
> Tom> Yeah, I think I will do that.
> 
> Tom> I can leave the old code around on the off chance it is useful to
> Tom> somebody with GCC 2.95.  I'm not sure this is really worthwhile, but it
> Tom> does have the virtue of making the patch more obviously ok.
> 
> Pedro> Would it be hard to make "set print vtbl on" do with newer binaries what
> Pedro> it supposedly does with older compiler built binaries, given the code
> Pedro> you've written for "info vtable"?
> 
> Tom> I think it is doable.  I will look at it.
> 
> I went with a much simpler patch, appended.  I am going to check it in.


Thanks.  That's certainly fine with me.

-- 
Pedro Alves