This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: move *-stub.c to stubs/

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
Cc: Stan Shebs <stanshebs at earthlink dot net>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:34:57 -0700
Subject: Re: RFA: move *-stub.c to stubs/
References: <BC462D69-603A-4A3D-ABD1-850839E9A6EB@adacore.com> <4F5E78ED.8050009@earthlink.net> <20120312230434.GQ2853@adacore.com> <4F5E8384.3000905@redhat.com>

> That came in in the context of docs and tests.  But in this case, does
> it really make sense to have essentially separate programs' logs in
> gdb's ChangeLog?  IMO, it doesn't.  IMO, it kind of follows exactly
> from putting the files in their own dir.  They're separate things, not
> part of GDB.

Hmm, valid points too. I agree it's better to keep the extra CL, now.

-- 
Joel

References:
- RFA: move *-stub.c to stubs/
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: RFA: move *-stub.c to stubs/
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: RFA: move *-stub.c to stubs/
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: RFA: move *-stub.c to stubs/
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]