This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix CU relative vs. absolute offsets [Re: RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback]

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:46:55 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix CU relative vs. absolute offsets [Re: RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback]
References: <20120305223429.GM2867@adacore.com> <20120307170940.GA22619@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120307185730.GQ2853@adacore.com>

> I don't really know the code well enough to give an opinion on
> the correctness of the patch, though. I can test them against our
> version of GCC 4.7. Will do that and report.

FWIW: I didn't see any regression with our testsuite and GCC 4.7.

-- 
Joel

Follow-Ups:
- [commit] [patch] Fix CU relative vs. absolute offsets [Re: RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- [patch] Fix CU relative vs. absolute offsets [Re: RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] Fix CU relative vs. absolute offsets [Re: RFC: problem with DW_OP_GNU_deref_type and dwarf's get_base_type callback]
  - From: Joel Brobecker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]