This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Fix PR gdb/12953: No hardware watchpoints on FreeBSD amd64
- From: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- To: valery dot khromov at gmail dot com
- Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, alves dot ped at gmail dot com, mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:51:14 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix PR gdb/12953: No hardware watchpoints on FreeBSD amd64
- References: <201112201931.pBKJV4bh021140@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <1324411833-38717-1-git-send-email-valery.khromov@gmail.com> <045981A0-EA00-4DC4-B16A-A9FEB3C87494@gmail.com> <m3d39y8fl3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <43DBD21E-8435-4AA9-A3F4-00E8056F7EC9@gmail.com>
> From: Valery Khromov <valery.khromov@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:03:23 +0300
>
> On 01.02.2012, at 23:27, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
> >>>>>> "Valery" == Valery Khromov <valery.khromov@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > Valery> I have copyright assignment paperwork finished.
> > Valery> What should I do next?
> >
> > I re-read the thread and I think there is still an unfulfilled request:
> >
> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-12/msg00695.html
> >
>
> "[PATCH v2]" is the latest version of the original patch which contains a single diff agains the current GDB CVS
> sources (as for December 2011).
> So, I believe the request from the link above has been fulfilled.
Yes. I think the "Contributed by ..." bit in amd64bsd-nat.h is a bit
silly given that this file only contains a couple of function
prototypes, but that's hardly worth arguing about.