This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Linespec tweak (was: Re: [RFA take 3] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738))

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:57:01 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFA] Linespec tweak (was: Re: [RFA take 3] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738))
References: <20120127151034.GA22606@redhat.com> <20120128001638.GA4448@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120128090724.GA30170@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120130140339.GB5210@redhat.com> <20120130141612.GA25851@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120130143916.GC5210@redhat.com>

On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:39:16 +0100, Gary Benson wrote:
> but the bit about la_iterate_over_symbols being too far away made me think
> you wanted it in linespec.c.

There is value passed between those, therefore they need to have the same
type/prototype, therefore they should share the same typedef.  I do not find
there a room for personal preferences.

Thanks,
Jan

References:
- [RFA take 3] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738)
  - From: Gary Benson
- Re: [RFA take 3] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738) [repost]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- [RFA] Linespec tweak (was: Re: [RFA take 3] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738))
  - From: Gary Benson
- Re: [RFA] Linespec tweak (was: Re: [RFA take 3] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738))
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [RFA] Linespec tweak (was: Re: [RFA take 3] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738))
  - From: Gary Benson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]