This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch 2/2] Fix watchpoints for multi-inferior #2
On 01/25/2012 06:03 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 01/25/2012 05:27 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 03:22 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> I really would like to get back to getting rid of those cont_thread
>> bits, but, this patch, very similar to the one linked above (which fixed
>> it for vAttach), completely fixes this testcase as well.
>
> Bah, no, it is still not sufficient. Don't know why it passed for me
> before. Looking again...
>
>> The issue is that cont_thread is also stale from the previous run, when we
>> start a new vRun. So I think the patch below is correct, and should
>> be applied.
This one is sufficient. The hints were all in your patch already, but
I guess I'm slow today.
Makes no sense setting the cont_thread to a process wildcard, there's no
such thing in the protocol. So this brings in a variant of your patch,
that fixes it early on, instead of late in the target, along with clearing
cont_thread on vRun.
gdb/gdbserver/
2012-01-25 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* server.c (start_inferior): Clear `cont_thread'.
(handle_v_cont): Don't set `cont_thread' if resuming all threads
of a process.
---
gdb/gdbserver/server.c | 7 ++++++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/server.c b/gdb/gdbserver/server.c
index c1788a9..aedf6f5 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbserver/server.c
+++ b/gdb/gdbserver/server.c
@@ -259,6 +259,10 @@ start_inferior (char **argv)
signal (SIGTTIN, SIG_DFL);
#endif
+ /* Clear this so the backend doesn't get confused, thinking
+ CONT_THREAD died, and it needs to resume all threads. */
+ cont_thread = null_ptid;
+
signal_pid = create_inferior (new_argv[0], new_argv);
/* FIXME: we don't actually know at this point that the create
@@ -1902,7 +1906,8 @@ handle_v_cont (char *own_buf)
/* Still used in occasional places in the backend. */
if (n == 1
- && !ptid_equal (resume_info[0].thread, minus_one_ptid)
+ && !(ptid_equal (resume_info[0].thread, minus_one_ptid)
+ || ptid_get_lwp (resume_info[0].thread) == -1)
&& resume_info[0].kind != resume_stop)
cont_thread = resume_info[0].thread;
else