This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[commit] add some comments to testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
- From: dje at google dot com (Doug Evans)
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 10:07:50 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: [commit] add some comments to testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
Hi.
In the process of cleaning up gdbserver testing I'm realizing
there is a bit of bitrot in stub testing.
gdbserver (e.g. the native-gdbserver.exp board file) uses it as a hack,
but it's a hack I'd like to remove.
Before that happens I want to do some cleanups of stub testing.
Here's a first step.
2011-12-03 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* gdb.exp (gdb_run_cmd, gdb_start_cmd, run_to_main): Add comments.
(gdb_step_for_stub): Add comments.
Index: gdb.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.194
diff -u -p -r1.194 gdb.exp
--- gdb.exp 2 Dec 2011 23:58:01 -0000 1.194
+++ gdb.exp 3 Dec 2011 17:50:11 -0000
@@ -187,14 +187,15 @@ proc delete_breakpoints {} {
}
}
-
-#
# Generic run command.
#
# The second pattern below matches up to the first newline *only*.
# Using ``.*$'' could swallow up output that we attempt to match
# elsewhere.
#
+# N.B. This function does not wait for gdb to return to the prompt,
+# that is the caller's responsibility.
+
proc gdb_run_cmd {args} {
global gdb_prompt
@@ -300,6 +301,9 @@ proc gdb_run_cmd {args} {
# Generic start command. Return 0 if we could start the program, -1
# if we could not.
+#
+# N.B. This function does not wait for gdb to return to the prompt,
+# that is the caller's responsibility.
proc gdb_start_cmd {args} {
global gdb_prompt
@@ -451,12 +455,14 @@ proc runto { function args } {
return 1
}
+# Ask gdb to run until we hit a breakpoint at main.
+# The case where the target uses stubs has to be handled
+# specially--if it uses stubs, assuming we hit
+# breakpoint() and just step out of the function.
#
-# runto_main -- ask gdb to run until we hit a breakpoint at main.
-# The case where the target uses stubs has to be handled
-# specially--if it uses stubs, assuming we hit
-# breakpoint() and just step out of the function.
-#
+# N.B. This function deletes all existing breakpoints.
+# If you don't want that, use gdb_start_cmd.
+
proc runto_main { } {
global gdb_prompt
global decimal
@@ -472,7 +478,6 @@ proc runto_main { } {
return 1
}
-
### Continue, and expect to hit a breakpoint.
### Report a pass or fail, depending on whether it seems to have
### worked. Use NAME as part of the test name; each call to
@@ -3142,6 +3147,32 @@ proc setup_kfail_for_target { PR target
}
}
+# Test programs for embedded (often "bare board") systems sometimes use a
+# "stub" either embedded in the test program itself or in the boot rom.
+# The job of the stub is to implement the remote protocol to communicate
+# with gdb and control the inferior. To initiate the remote protocol
+# session with gdb the stub needs to be given control by the inferior.
+# They do this by calling a function that typically triggers a trap
+# from main that transfers control to the stub.
+# The purpose of this function, gdb_step_for_stub, is to step out of
+# that function ("breakpoint" in the example below) and back into main.
+#
+# Example:
+#
+# int
+# main ()
+# {
+# #ifdef usestubs
+# set_debug_traps (); /* install trap handlers for stub */
+# breakpoint (); /* trigger a trap to give the stub control */
+# #endif
+# /* test program begins here */
+# }
+#
+# Note that one consequence of this design is that a breakpoint on "main"
+# does not Just Work (because if the target could stop there you still have
+# to step past the calls to set_debug_traps,breakpoint).
+
proc gdb_step_for_stub { } {
global gdb_prompt;