This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: manual updates for c++

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 21:46:10 +0100
Subject: Re: RFA: manual updates for c++
References: <m3mxc3byv7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <838vnngj7b.fsf@gnu.org> <m3lirmu2ku.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:00:01 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Both -gstabs+ and -gdwarf-2 are obsolete nowadays
> 
> Eli> On most platforms, but not on all of them.  It's true that -gdwarf-2
> Eli> is the default, though.
> 
> No, -gdwarf-3 is the default.  Someday it will be -gdwarf-4.  -gdwarf-2
> really is obsolete,

FSF GCC
	gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20111127 (experimental)

still has -gdwarf-2 as the default.  Fedora GCCs have now -gdwarf-4
(with -fno-debug-types-section now) as the default.

(Your doc change is not affected by this.)


Regards,
Jan

References:
- RFA: manual updates for c++
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: manual updates for c++
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: RFA: manual updates for c++
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]