This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch 2/5] allow pending tracepoint
On 11/17/2011 03:03 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> > Note that we don't check/validate SALs for pending fast trace point,
>> > because inferior may not be ready to access at that moment.
> Hmm, confusing comment. You don't validate the SALs for pending
> tracepoints because a pending tracepoint has only one dummy sal,
> and it makes no sense to validate a dummy sal.
Yes, the sal->pc is 0x0, and we'll get this error from GDB:
"Cannot access memory at address 0x0"
You are right, and my description is confusing/misleading.
>> > - struct breakpoint *b;
>> > + struct breakpoint *b = NULL;
> Unnecessary initialization.