This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:46:24 -0700
Subject: Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
References: <m3obx184iu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20111028221459.GA28467@host1.jankratochvil.net> <m3ty6nzhkk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m38vnxrkxz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20111104074543.GA13839@host1.jankratochvil.net> <m339dyk1v6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3aa85f8io.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m3vcqmpg0i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4EC31FBA.9050706@codesourcery.com>

Yao> I tried to apply this patch to FSF trunk, but there are some conflicts
Yao> in breakpoint.c, valprint.c and symtab.c.  Conflicts in the first two
Yao> files are trivial to me, but conflict in symtab.c isn't.  I noticed Jan
Yao> and Pierre must have applied this patch, but I wonder how that happen.

I'll rebase it today and send out a new patch.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal
  - From: Yao Qi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]