This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[commit] [patch#2] fetch result of locdesc expressions as integer (not address)
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:13:00 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > What we could perhaps try is to push 'integer-to-address(0)', rather
> > than zero itself. Then, if we want the offset, then subtract that
> > same integer-to-address(0) value from the result.
+
> SRAM address 0 is valid, but if you convert NULL to a non-0 value, many
> things get broken!
You can see the Joel's idea does not work due to it. The very first field
stays at 0 while every other field gets shifted by 0x800000.
I believe the NULL exception should be in specific cases at the callers.
One would have to create some 0xdeadf00d artificial address as the base struct
address but I do not think one can create arbitrary addresses as on gdbarches
it may not be a valid address.
Just there is no real reason to keep the patch in place now, I should review
it after some form of archer-jankratochvil-vla gets in.
Filed a new KFAIL-tracker:
Support DW_AT_location complex DWARF expressions
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13307
and checked in the reversion.
Sorry,
Jan
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2011-10/msg00132.html
--- src/gdb/ChangeLog 2011/10/16 19:40:36 1.13439
+++ src/gdb/ChangeLog 2011/10/17 12:57:13 1.13440
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+2011-10-17 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+ Revert:
+ 2011-07-27 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+ * dwarf2expr.c (ctx_no_read_reg): New function.
+ * dwarf2expr.h (ctx_no_read_reg): New declaration.
+ * dwarf2read.c (read_2_signed_bytes, read_4_signed_bytes): Remove.
+ (decode_locdesc_read_mem, decode_locdesc_ctx_funcs): New.
+ (decode_locdesc): Replace by a caller of dwarf_expr_eval.
+
2011-10-16 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* NEWS: Document python gdb.printing.register_pretty_printer's new
--- src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2011/10/16 08:42:02 1.2899
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2011/10/17 12:57:15 1.2900
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2011-10-17 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+ * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-simple-locdesc.exp (p &s.shl): KFAIL it.
+ Revert the part of:
+ 2011-07-27 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+ * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-stack-boundary.exp (check partial symtab errors):
+ Change the expected string.
+
2011-10-16 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Fix results with system glibc debug info installed.
--- src/gdb/dwarf2expr.c 2011/10/09 19:43:40 1.76
+++ src/gdb/dwarf2expr.c 2011/10/17 12:57:14 1.77
@@ -1471,14 +1471,6 @@
gdb_assert (ctx->recursion_depth >= 0);
}
-/* Stub dwarf_expr_context_funcs.read_reg implementation. */
-
-CORE_ADDR
-ctx_no_read_reg (void *baton, int regnum)
-{
- error (_("Registers access is invalid in this context"));
-}
-
/* Stub dwarf_expr_context_funcs.get_frame_base implementation. */
void
--- src/gdb/dwarf2expr.h 2011/10/09 19:43:40 1.41
+++ src/gdb/dwarf2expr.h 2011/10/17 12:57:14 1.42
@@ -270,7 +270,6 @@
/* Stub dwarf_expr_context_funcs implementations. */
-CORE_ADDR ctx_no_read_reg (void *baton, int regnum);
void ctx_no_get_frame_base (void *baton, const gdb_byte **start,
size_t *length);
CORE_ADDR ctx_no_get_frame_cfa (void *baton);
--- src/gdb/dwarf2read.c 2011/10/13 09:36:47 1.573
+++ src/gdb/dwarf2read.c 2011/10/17 12:57:14 1.574
@@ -10297,12 +10297,24 @@
return bfd_get_16 (abfd, buf);
}
+static int
+read_2_signed_bytes (bfd *abfd, gdb_byte *buf)
+{
+ return bfd_get_signed_16 (abfd, buf);
+}
+
static unsigned int
read_4_bytes (bfd *abfd, gdb_byte *buf)
{
return bfd_get_32 (abfd, buf);
}
+static int
+read_4_signed_bytes (bfd *abfd, gdb_byte *buf)
+{
+ return bfd_get_signed_32 (abfd, buf);
+}
+
static ULONGEST
read_8_bytes (bfd *abfd, gdb_byte *buf)
{
@@ -14419,37 +14431,6 @@
dwarf2_per_objfile->read_in_chain = &type_sig->per_cu;
}
-/* Workaround as dwarf_expr_context_funcs.read_mem implementation before
- a proper runtime DWARF expressions evaluator gets implemented.
- Otherwise gnuv3_baseclass_offset would error by:
- Expected a negative vbase offset (old compiler?) */
-
-static void
-decode_locdesc_read_mem (void *baton, gdb_byte *buf, CORE_ADDR addr,
- size_t length)
-{
- struct dwarf_expr_context *ctx = baton;
- struct gdbarch *gdbarch = ctx->gdbarch;
- struct type *ptr_type = builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
-
- memset (buf, 0, length);
-
- if (TYPE_LENGTH (ptr_type) == length)
- store_typed_address (buf, ptr_type, addr);
-}
-
-static const struct dwarf_expr_context_funcs decode_locdesc_ctx_funcs =
-{
- ctx_no_read_reg,
- decode_locdesc_read_mem,
- ctx_no_get_frame_base,
- ctx_no_get_frame_cfa,
- ctx_no_get_frame_pc,
- ctx_no_get_tls_address,
- ctx_no_dwarf_call,
- ctx_no_get_base_type
-};
-
/* Decode simple location descriptions.
Given a pointer to a dwarf block that defines a location, compute
the location and return the value.
@@ -14467,60 +14448,235 @@
object is optimized out. The return value is 0 for that case.
FIXME drow/2003-11-16: No callers check for this case any more; soon all
callers will only want a very basic result and this can become a
- complaint. */
+ complaint.
+
+ Note that stack[0] is unused except as a default error return. */
static CORE_ADDR
decode_locdesc (struct dwarf_block *blk, struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
{
struct objfile *objfile = cu->objfile;
- struct dwarf_expr_context *ctx;
- struct cleanup *old_chain;
- volatile struct gdb_exception ex;
+ int i;
+ int size = blk->size;
+ gdb_byte *data = blk->data;
+ CORE_ADDR stack[64];
+ int stacki;
+ unsigned int bytes_read, unsnd;
+ gdb_byte op;
- ctx = new_dwarf_expr_context ();
- old_chain = make_cleanup_free_dwarf_expr_context (ctx);
- make_cleanup_value_free_to_mark (value_mark ());
+ i = 0;
+ stacki = 0;
+ stack[stacki] = 0;
+ stack[++stacki] = 0;
- ctx->gdbarch = get_objfile_arch (objfile);
- ctx->addr_size = cu->header.addr_size;
- ctx->ref_addr_size = dwarf2_per_cu_ref_addr_size (cu->per_cu);
- ctx->offset = ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, SECT_OFF_TEXT (objfile));
- ctx->baton = ctx;
- ctx->funcs = &decode_locdesc_ctx_funcs;
+ while (i < size)
+ {
+ op = data[i++];
+ switch (op)
+ {
+ case DW_OP_lit0:
+ case DW_OP_lit1:
+ case DW_OP_lit2:
+ case DW_OP_lit3:
+ case DW_OP_lit4:
+ case DW_OP_lit5:
+ case DW_OP_lit6:
+ case DW_OP_lit7:
+ case DW_OP_lit8:
+ case DW_OP_lit9:
+ case DW_OP_lit10:
+ case DW_OP_lit11:
+ case DW_OP_lit12:
+ case DW_OP_lit13:
+ case DW_OP_lit14:
+ case DW_OP_lit15:
+ case DW_OP_lit16:
+ case DW_OP_lit17:
+ case DW_OP_lit18:
+ case DW_OP_lit19:
+ case DW_OP_lit20:
+ case DW_OP_lit21:
+ case DW_OP_lit22:
+ case DW_OP_lit23:
+ case DW_OP_lit24:
+ case DW_OP_lit25:
+ case DW_OP_lit26:
+ case DW_OP_lit27:
+ case DW_OP_lit28:
+ case DW_OP_lit29:
+ case DW_OP_lit30:
+ case DW_OP_lit31:
+ stack[++stacki] = op - DW_OP_lit0;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_reg0:
+ case DW_OP_reg1:
+ case DW_OP_reg2:
+ case DW_OP_reg3:
+ case DW_OP_reg4:
+ case DW_OP_reg5:
+ case DW_OP_reg6:
+ case DW_OP_reg7:
+ case DW_OP_reg8:
+ case DW_OP_reg9:
+ case DW_OP_reg10:
+ case DW_OP_reg11:
+ case DW_OP_reg12:
+ case DW_OP_reg13:
+ case DW_OP_reg14:
+ case DW_OP_reg15:
+ case DW_OP_reg16:
+ case DW_OP_reg17:
+ case DW_OP_reg18:
+ case DW_OP_reg19:
+ case DW_OP_reg20:
+ case DW_OP_reg21:
+ case DW_OP_reg22:
+ case DW_OP_reg23:
+ case DW_OP_reg24:
+ case DW_OP_reg25:
+ case DW_OP_reg26:
+ case DW_OP_reg27:
+ case DW_OP_reg28:
+ case DW_OP_reg29:
+ case DW_OP_reg30:
+ case DW_OP_reg31:
+ stack[++stacki] = op - DW_OP_reg0;
+ if (i < size)
+ dwarf2_complex_location_expr_complaint ();
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_regx:
+ unsnd = read_unsigned_leb128 (NULL, (data + i), &bytes_read);
+ i += bytes_read;
+ stack[++stacki] = unsnd;
+ if (i < size)
+ dwarf2_complex_location_expr_complaint ();
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_addr:
+ stack[++stacki] = read_address (objfile->obfd, &data[i],
+ cu, &bytes_read);
+ i += bytes_read;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_const1u:
+ stack[++stacki] = read_1_byte (objfile->obfd, &data[i]);
+ i += 1;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_const1s:
+ stack[++stacki] = read_1_signed_byte (objfile->obfd, &data[i]);
+ i += 1;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_const2u:
+ stack[++stacki] = read_2_bytes (objfile->obfd, &data[i]);
+ i += 2;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_const2s:
+ stack[++stacki] = read_2_signed_bytes (objfile->obfd, &data[i]);
+ i += 2;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_const4u:
+ stack[++stacki] = read_4_bytes (objfile->obfd, &data[i]);
+ i += 4;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_const4s:
+ stack[++stacki] = read_4_signed_bytes (objfile->obfd, &data[i]);
+ i += 4;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_constu:
+ stack[++stacki] = read_unsigned_leb128 (NULL, (data + i),
+ &bytes_read);
+ i += bytes_read;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_consts:
+ stack[++stacki] = read_signed_leb128 (NULL, (data + i), &bytes_read);
+ i += bytes_read;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_dup:
+ stack[stacki + 1] = stack[stacki];
+ stacki++;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_plus:
+ stack[stacki - 1] += stack[stacki];
+ stacki--;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_plus_uconst:
+ stack[stacki] += read_unsigned_leb128 (NULL, (data + i),
+ &bytes_read);
+ i += bytes_read;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_minus:
+ stack[stacki - 1] -= stack[stacki];
+ stacki--;
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_deref:
+ /* If we're not the last op, then we definitely can't encode
+ this using GDB's address_class enum. This is valid for partial
+ global symbols, although the variable's address will be bogus
+ in the psymtab. */
+ if (i < size)
+ dwarf2_complex_location_expr_complaint ();
+ break;
+
+ case DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address:
+ /* The top of the stack has the offset from the beginning
+ of the thread control block at which the variable is located. */
+ /* Nothing should follow this operator, so the top of stack would
+ be returned. */
+ /* This is valid for partial global symbols, but the variable's
+ address will be bogus in the psymtab. */
+ if (i < size)
+ dwarf2_complex_location_expr_complaint ();
+ break;
- /* DW_AT_data_member_location expects the structure address to be pushed on
- the stack. Simulate the offset by address 0. */
- dwarf_expr_push_address (ctx, 0, 0);
+ case DW_OP_GNU_uninit:
+ break;
- TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
- {
- dwarf_expr_eval (ctx, blk->data, blk->size);
- }
- if (ex.reason < 0)
- {
- if (ex.message)
- complaint (&symfile_complaints, "%s", ex.message);
- }
- else if (ctx->num_pieces == 0)
- switch (ctx->location)
- {
- /* The returned number will be bogus, just do not complain for locations
- in global registers - it is here only a partial symbol address. */
- case DWARF_VALUE_REGISTER:
+ default:
+ {
+ const char *name = dwarf_stack_op_name (op);
- case DWARF_VALUE_MEMORY:
- case DWARF_VALUE_STACK:
- {
- CORE_ADDR address = dwarf_expr_fetch_address (ctx, 0);
+ if (name)
+ complaint (&symfile_complaints, _("unsupported stack op: '%s'"),
+ name);
+ else
+ complaint (&symfile_complaints, _("unsupported stack op: '%02x'"),
+ op);
+ }
- do_cleanups (old_chain);
- return address;
+ return (stack[stacki]);
}
- }
- do_cleanups (old_chain);
- dwarf2_complex_location_expr_complaint ();
- return 0;
+ /* Enforce maximum stack depth of SIZE-1 to avoid writing
+ outside of the allocated space. Also enforce minimum>0. */
+ if (stacki >= ARRAY_SIZE (stack) - 1)
+ {
+ complaint (&symfile_complaints,
+ _("location description stack overflow"));
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (stacki <= 0)
+ {
+ complaint (&symfile_complaints,
+ _("location description stack underflow"));
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+ return (stack[stacki]);
}
/* memory allocation interface */
--- src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-simple-locdesc.exp 2011/07/27 21:18:40 1.2
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-simple-locdesc.exp 2011/10/17 12:57:15 1.3
@@ -32,7 +32,15 @@
# Re: [patch 2/2] Fix decode_locdesc for gcc-4.7.x optimized DWARF
# http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-07/msg00766.html
-gdb_test "p &s.shl" { = \(int \*\) 0x1000000}
+set test "p &s.shl"
+gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
+ -re " = \\(int \\*\\) 0x1000000\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ pass $test
+ }
+ -re " = \\(int \\*\\) 0x14\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ kfail "symtab/13307" $test
+ }
+}
# Re: RFC: fix DW_AT_data_member_location buglet
# http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-05/msg00291.html
--- src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-stack-boundary.exp 2011/07/27 17:08:06 1.4
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-stack-boundary.exp 2011/10/17 12:57:15 1.5
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
}
}
gdb_test_no_output "set complaints 100"
-gdb_test "file $binfile" {Reading symbols from .*\.\.\.Asked for position 0 of stack, stack only has 0 elements on it\..*\.\.\.done\.} "check partial symtab errors"
+gdb_test "file $binfile" {Reading symbols from .*\.\.\.location description stack underflow\.\.\.location description stack overflow\.\.\.done\.} "check partial symtab errors"
gdb_test "p underflow" {Asked for position 0 of stack, stack only has 0 elements on it\.}
gdb_test "p overflow" " = 2"