Re: [RFC] canonical linespec and multiple breakpoints ...

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Avi" == Avi Gozlan <avi@checkpoint.com> writes:

Sorry about the delay in my reply.  I was offline all of September.

Avi> Among varying GDB uses, we use GDB to debug a process which loads
Avi> (using dlopen) the same exact library multiple times (in fact there
Avi> are copies of the library otherwise dlopen returns the same handle for
Avi> each load).

Avi> 1) The proposal discusses function breakpoints. Will it also enable
Avi> inspecting global and static variables from a specific library?

No, I'm afraid not.

I think implementing something for variables could be done, but it would
be a separate project, maybe with a different approach.  I can advise if
you are interested in this.

Avi> 2) Just to make sure we understand the interaction of the user
Avi> interface with "set multiple-symbols": it will be possible to request
Avi> GDB for a specific variable/function by a library name without getting
Avi> it from all libraries or get a question (ask) each time, right?
Avi> Otherwise it will be very inconvenient to inspect multiple variables
Avi> within a given library.

Yes, this will work as you expect.

Avi> 3) Will the library specific interface know how to handle non-stripped
Avi> libraries that are compiled without debug information (no "-g")?

Yes.  This is already implemented on my branch.  It improves GDB's
behavior here, so that the right thing happens if you have multiple
instance of a name where some symbols have debuginfo and some do not.

Avi> 4) We suggest adding an option to enable the GDB backtrace command to
Avi> show the library name for each function. In our usage case we have
Avi> scenarios in which the libraries interact with each other and a
Avi> backtrace showing the library name for each function can enable us
Avi> understand the interaction perfectly.

There was an earlier thread about this, I'm not sure what happened in
the end though.  I think this would be a good addition.  If there is no
bug report for this, could you file one?

Avi> 5) Perhaps a little pedantic but what about handling symbols with
Avi> different names in libraries with identical name which lie in
Avi> different paths?

I didn't implement the "objfile" prefix stuff yet, but my plan is to let
you specify as much of the path as you want, e.g.:

  break libsomething.so:function
  break /lib/libsomething.so:function
  break some/leading/dirs/libsomething.so:function

Tom